Although I’m a huge believer in and user of research, I don’t consider myself an expert. But for years, I’ve been bugged by the feeling that most of the employee surveys conducted by large companies is fairly useless. It often seemed to me that these big annual surveys asked the wrong questions, or asked them in a way that didn’t provide any valuable information. In my experience, these surveys were “owned” by the HR department, purchased from large consulting companies, and there was huge resistance to modifying the survey. No one particularly liked the survey, as far as I could see the knowledge gained did not lead to any actions, and I didn’t see the point. But since HR was driving it, and since I’m not a research expert, I generally stayed out of it.
This week while attending the IABC UK chapter’s holiday gathering I met someone who is an expert on research, and he confirmed my suspicions. In fact, he’s written a book on the subject. IABC member Peter Hutton is Managing Director of Brand Energy Research, and he gave me a copy of his new book, “What Are Your Staff Trying to Tell You?” In it, Peter examines what’s wrong with the leading employee surveys (he takes on Gallup and Best Companies) and why they’re flawed, and explains why many of the measures of “employee engagement” are misleading and unreliable. Best of all, he tells all this in ways that a non-expert can understand it, and in just 160 pages. Armed with this, I think I’d have the courage to take on HR and insist on taking an active role in developing more meaningful research.
Anybody else out there have positive or negative feelings about your company’s employee surveys? Do you think they provide useful information to management? Do they help inform your internal communication strategies? Are they asking the right questions, in the right way?
Hi,
Thanks for the tip about Peter’s book. I plan to buy it soon.
In addition to employers often not asking the right questions or not asking them in the right way, one thing that really bothers me is when employees are surveyed, they take the time to answer the questions, and then there’s no communication with employees. People open up about what could be improved, but nothing happens. At a minimum the company should tell employees what it learned and what it intends to do to improve (if applicable). Even if it doesn’t intend to do anything, it’s best to be honest about that. There’s nothing worse than asking employees to respond to a survey and then leaving them feeling like their responses have fallen on deaf ears. This ruins the reputation and credibility of all of us who do survey research.
A survey should be a two-way communication. If a company conducts a survey, they owe it to employees to tell them what they plan to do with the findings and then to follow through on their word.
Best,
Michaela
Overall, I’ve been impressed with the communication surveys used at my company as well as how and when they are used.
To keep the questions going, not only are the surveys being handled correctly, but is leadership then looking at and understanding the results? If it is a good survey, will they take steps to make changes if feedback is overwhelming in one area?
I actually had one person state that she did not send the results to the management team as they never did anything with it. That is a problem within itself.
My first thoughts when I saw this post were very similar to those, which were written down by Michaela. As she pointed out the worst one is if there is no feedback.
At my company there was a survey in the beginning of 2006 (that time I worked somewhere else). It was conducted by several colleagues from different subsidiaries of the group company.There were deep interviews and the sample of the employees were representative. Eventually, they made a good job. But the results reflected a really honest and true picture of what is going on inside the company so the management of our company decided not to give any feedback.
Then in the beginning of 2008 we prepared our “own” survey. It was an in-house one only. The participation ratio was around 16%. There was some kind of feedback but they did not want to disseminate the results until they have some solutions. BTW, they were not eager to tell the European HQ that they conducted their own survey…
Thanks for the post and the info on Peter Hutton’s book. It will be interesting to read what he has to say about the proprietary surveys mentioned.
Internal, behind-the-firewall, social media represent a continuous, on-going survey of sorts.
[…] Is Your Employee Survey Asking the Wrong Questions? (barbgibson.x.iabc.com) […]